The opposition People’s Party has raised concerns about the government’s casino project, following recent modifications to the plan that they believe could lead to questionable business practices.
Nont Pisarnlimjaroenkit, a People’s Party MP representing Nonthaburi, addressed parliament, stating that the government, led by Prime Minister Paetongtarn Shinawatra, aims to generate new revenue by bringing underground operations into the tax fold. This initiative includes the development of an entertainment complex featuring a casino, intended to combat illegal gambling and provide additional financial resources for the country.
However, the government has yet to clarify whether it envisions the entertainment complex as a large-scale operation comparable to Macau’s high-end casinos or as something more akin to those in neighboring countries.
Mr. Nont emphasized that even nations like Singapore, Vietnam, and the Philippines struggle to attract as many tourists as Macau’s casino scene. He expressed skepticism regarding the Thai government’s ability to replicate the success of Macau’s casino industry, noting that the potential consequences of legalizing casinos have not been sufficiently considered.
At present, the penalties for illegal online and onsite gambling are minimal. Offenders face a mere 2,000 baht fine, while operators could incur fines ranging from 20,000 to 200,000 baht and/or imprisonment for up to two years. Critics argue that these penalties are insufficient.
The proposed entertainment complex would impose a 5,000 baht admission fee on Thai citizens, which Mr. Nont believes may be prohibitively expensive, potentially driving them toward illegal or online gambling alternatives. He insisted that stronger legal frameworks must be established prior to the introduction of casinos.
Additionally, he expressed concerns regarding law enforcement, especially amidst recent reports of high-ranking police officials being involved in illicit activities and online gambling operations.
“If these fundamental issues are not addressed, an entertainment complex may ultimately become a hotspot for more questionable business activities in the future,” he warned.
The bill for the entertainment complex also reduces certain requirements, including the removal of key elements like a large conference center, a comprehensive wellness facility, and five- or six-star hotel accommodations.
“There are noticeable irregularities, such as the omission of critical components needed to operate a legitimate entertainment complex,” he remarked.
“Instead of establishing a well-regulated entertainment venue, this initiative seems to prioritize the interests of wealthy individuals or capitalists who can dominate the casino sector nationwide,” he cautioned. He urged the government to thoroughly review all aspects of the project before moving forward.